I attended this small albeit vibrant meeting last week. I attended a lot and presented twice. Highlights were Cameron Knott’s presentation about complexity and simulation in healthcare. A takeaway quote from that was “Healthcare is a vocational education setting” – that reminder that we are always learning. Cameron riffed off Victoria Brazil’s Translational Simulation paper and challenged us to see if our work matches our polices – the work imagined as work done view.
A slide I loved but did not grab a photo off was from Cameron’s talk. A whiteboard post-sim and across the top was “What I learnt” on one side and on the other “What I want to learn” a reminded about the importance of considering the learners needs in scenario objective design.
There was a very engaging talk from Tanya Edlington who is a professional simulated patient. Not something I have experience with yet but a great talk.
Some great short presentations about simulation in constrained circumstances – Ebola in Sierra Leone, Samoa and Myanmar.
I had read about Tag Team Patient Safety Simulation before and was keen to attend the workshop. This approach seems great for larger groups as many people get some engagement in a scenario. Circling back to the ideas about targeted objectives and learning points, the use of cue cards for the audience focuses attention on learning points.
Overall a great couple of days, thanks VSA committee for putting it together.
When transitioning from the scenario to the debrief last week I felt rushed. I then also felt jumbled in the debrief and realised that I had moved straight from the scenario to the debrief without any pause or gathering my thoughts. Listening to Simulation Podcast Ep 52 with Jenny Rudolph added some thoughts to the busyness of your thoughts with debriefing. So I will aim to shoo participants out of the room, collect my thoughts, jot down some notes and then move onto the debrief!
There is plenty of work in setting up a simulation series for your workplace – however the encouragement like this is well worth it! This is from an IUD placement/cervical shock simulation run two weeks ago.
While writing a scenario for cervical shock during IUD placement, I reflected on that very small team – the patient, doctor and one nurse. This is often present during smaller procedures compared to the larger team for something like a procedural sedation. Thinking then about the objectives for the scenario often being around early recognition of an event and BLS – in this case pallor, sweating, bradycardia, only those two people present benefit from the problem recognition phase. Hopefully then the button is pressed, help arrives and other useful lessons are used – shared mental model, team leader selection, clear communication. Is there a role for having the other participants in the room for that first recognition of collapse so they can imagine what they would do next? This is used with the Tag Team Patient Safety Simulation for CQ University. Or is it better to reflect daily practice and have your other adhoc members off in their own rooms, awaiting the emergency call?
In episode eleven, Victoria Brazil and Jesse Spur are joined by Kyla Caners from Emsim cases who’s templates at EMsimcases I have mentioned before. There were a couple of great reflections for me in this podcast – around ensuring objectives are present for all the disparate members of the team and the point that a team does not need to solve the case. By not solving the case, the team may have to work all the way through an algorithm and focus on ensuring basics are covered well.
Expanding on the idea of improving my focus as the sim provider on measurable objectives, I have been thinking about how I write scenarios and looking at how others do it. I recently came across two disparate but well done examples. the flowchart idea is from the Oxford Deanery simulation scenarios, using flow charts to give options about how easy to hard the scenario progresses to.
The other detailed tickbox approach which uses an internal cascade of modifiers and triggers is from emsimcases. Is this approach too cluttered – the OCD part of me likes the many tickboxes to ensure I am assessing objectives as ways of measuring progress towards the goals of the simulation. This is a link to their blank template.
Encouragingly both of these cases are available as a creative commons licence – great work FOAMed teams!
With a recent scenario we realised in debrief that we are not using PPE. Participants are not putting on gloves or glasses before engaging in the scenario. I then realised on reflection that as the sim provider, I am not identifying this in the scenario and the reason I am not identifying this is poor creation of objectives in the sim scenario. Goals are the attainable, relevant aims for the scenario. Objectives are the measurable items that confirm the goals are being attained. I have also seen this called “expected care”, such as in this template for scenario design from SMACC Chicago 2015.
This then flows onto other items in the scenario, time to CPR, time to AED, checking pad contact and other markers of quality care. Especially as an occasional sim provider, creation of checklists in the scenario writing should help me ensure we are actually meeting goals and then objectives.
In scenarios from the simtech, objectives are further broken down into Knowledge/Skills/Attitude & Behaviours. This seems like a great approach however a significant ramp up in being able to observe and record this all across a scenario.
Thinking about this more overnight, I also need to bring in different objectives for different members of the team. Being medical, this is my focus however integration with goals/objectives for reception and nursing would make this work more applicable to them and hopefully foster engagement.
One powerful facet of in situ simulation that self-evidently cannot be done elsewhere is orientation to a new practice/clinic. Today I was covering foreign body removal with the two new registrars who have just rotated in to our clinic one week ago.
Rather than collect all the items needed for the tutorial myself, it is more useful for them to find the eye box, loupe, amethocaine, flouroscein and bring them to the room. Then run through the examination, foreign body removal and disposition as a short scenario with a debrief. Now the registrar has had some practice on a task trainer and is orientated to the practice resources.
The task trainer was made with peeled grape eyes with 100’s & 1000’s (cake sprinkles) as FB that leach out a food colouring “rust ring”. The grapes were held in place with modelling clay and tape. The tape has been partially folded back on itself to create an eyelid that can be everted.